delegates

I don't understand: Clinton says that if we had the Republican's nominating procedure, where winner takes all delegates in each contest, that she would be the winner. So I counted the pledged delegates from the NYTimes count and added the totals. Obama has almost 500 more than Clinton if winner takes all in each contest. This doesn't include Michigan or Florida, nor does it include states that tied or states that haven't seated their delegates yet.

How does she figure it? All of the information I've seen refutes her math.